Two divergent accounts of a terrorist attack

One version from news.com.au courtesy of AFP

Teenage attacker shot dead after Jerusalem stabbing: police

Second version from Al Jazeera and endorsed by The Courier Mail

Israeli settlers cheer after police shoot dead unarmed teenager at Jerusalem rail station

This kind of reporting is an utter disgrace and should be condemned for its egregious anti-Israel bias. How can someone be unarmed if they have committed a terrorist attack by stabbing and wounding a civilian? Why are the bystanders being labelled as ‘settlers’?